GQ4GQ.

Someone wrote…

In searching for a mate/friend/partner/lover/co-conspirator, I will need a category titled “genderqueer4genderqueer.” GQ4GQ.

What’s your experience?

And what are you thinking about gender right now?


Posted by on March 12th, 2010 at 08:00 am

Category: your voice 9 comments »

9 Responses to “GQ4GQ.”

  1. Mapie
    March 12th, 2010 at 8:42 am |

    Hell yes! I’m fully in support of this category.

    [Reply]
  2. FTMango
    March 12th, 2010 at 9:07 am |

    that would call for a PARTAAAAYYY!!!

    [Reply]
  3. Milo
    March 12th, 2010 at 11:08 am |

    That would call for a parade.

    [Reply]
  4. AgentRusco
    March 12th, 2010 at 11:51 am |

    certainly needed. yesyes

    [Reply]
  5. Ava
    March 13th, 2010 at 6:59 am |

    that’s nice idea. :)

    [Reply]
  6. musingvirtual
    March 13th, 2010 at 7:09 pm |

    this.

    [Reply]
  7. Anonymous
    March 13th, 2010 at 7:22 pm |

    Maybe using the more inclusive definition of “trans” (as in transgender as in transgressive of genders roles instead of just male to female or female to male) would work okay?

    [Reply]
  8. Taylor
    March 17th, 2010 at 3:15 am |

    Definitely agree. It’s the option for me because I don’t think anyone else would understand everything.

    [Reply]
  9. a.j.c.r.
    April 27th, 2010 at 8:31 pm |

    would like to meet you!!!

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply


Can I show your picture? If you have a Gravatar associated with this email address, it will be displayed as your photo. If not, I'll just put a picture of a fork next to your comment. Everybody likes forks.

Be nice. Judgmental comments will be quietly deleted and blacklisted. There's plenty of room for those elsewhere on the web.

For legal reasons, you must be age 13 or older to post a comment on Genderfork.

You can use some HTML tags for formatting, e.g. <em>...</em> for emphasis (italics) or <strong>...</strong> for strong emphasis (bold) or <a href="http://(url)">...</a> for links.


↑ Back to top