Someone wrote…

In searching for a mate/friend/partner/lover/co-conspirator, I will need a category titled “genderqueer4genderqueer.” GQ4GQ.

What’s your experience?

And what are you thinking about gender right now?

Posted by on March 12th, 2010 at 08:00 am

Category: your voice 9 comments »

9 Responses to “GQ4GQ.”

  1. Mapie

    Hell yes! I’m fully in support of this category.


  2. FTMango

    that would call for a PARTAAAAYYY!!!


  3. Milo

    That would call for a parade.


  4. AgentRusco

    certainly needed. yesyes


  5. Ava

    that’s nice idea. :)


  6. musingvirtual



  7. Anonymous

    Maybe using the more inclusive definition of “trans” (as in transgender as in transgressive of genders roles instead of just male to female or female to male) would work okay?


  8. Taylor

    Definitely agree. It’s the option for me because I don’t think anyone else would understand everything.


  9. a.j.c.r.

    would like to meet you!!!


Leave a Reply

Can I show your picture? If you have a Gravatar associated with this email address, it will be displayed as your photo. If not, I'll just put a picture of a fork next to your comment. Everybody likes forks.

Be nice. Judgmental comments will be quietly deleted and blacklisted. There's plenty of room for those elsewhere on the web.

For legal reasons, you must be age 13 or older to post a comment on Genderfork.

You can use some HTML tags for formatting, e.g. <em>...</em> for emphasis (italics) or <strong>...</strong> for strong emphasis (bold) or <a href="http://(url)">...</a> for links.

Back to top