It frustrates me.

Someone wrote…

It frustrates me that androgyny always seems to not include breasts.

What’s your experience?

And what are you thinking about gender right now?


Posted by on September 14th, 2010 at 08:38 am

Category: your voice 34 comments »

34 Responses to “It frustrates me.”

  1. Anonymous

    Agreed! Since when did the medias (including our own) image of androgyny become so limited? Common queers, we can do better!

    [Reply]

  2. AJ

    I hear you on this. It’s frustrating as hell when people see curves and refuse to see any possibility of androgyny. It’s a state of mind, too!

    [Reply]

  3. Anonymous

    This has always infuriated me as it buys into really sexist conceptions of gender where traits associated with the female form are viewed as deviant.

    [Reply]

  4. Eliot-Anna

    I love you for pointing this out because it’s true but also it really made me think about the way I identify and the way I choose to present myself and why.

    [Reply]

  5. Clara

    OMG – YES – THIS JUST OCCURRED TO ME THE OTHER DAY : WEIRD ISN’T IT???

    [Reply]

  6. Anonymous

    Hmmm…it reflects a sort of… sex-less, childlike aspect of androgyny, doesn’ it?
    Well, the boob-less kind, that is… in terms of the “look” of it…
    Very limited, very tried, i must say.
    Maybe even over-exposed…
    Not that there’s anything wrong with that look, not at all, just the predominance of it…

    [Reply]

    Simon replied:

    Yeah, exactly. I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. How do we move beyond that is the question.

    [Reply]

  7. Jay

    I’d wager its probably because general society is *so* focused on breasts as a Very Feminine/Female Thing. :/ Which is sad, but there it is…

    [Reply]

  8. Anonymous

    Sigh. This pretty much sums up my struggles with being read as androgynous. Inevitably someone sees the boobs and snaps to FEMALE and then it’s very difficult to shake the female pronouns.

    [Reply]

  9. Bean

    Omahyra Mota. Look her up.
    Here, have some androgyny with boobs:

    [Reply]

    Jessica replied:

    Oh My, what a stunning person. Speaking as someone with breasts, they are disproportionately important in gender assumptions. The only thing approaching comparable gender identification prejudice is a full beard. Ergo the “bearded lady” “freaks” as standards in road shows and circuses for so many years. Well, in the words of Steven Stills “let your freak flag fly.”

    [Reply]

  10. Bean

    Awww, it didn’t show the pic. Here:
    http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll284/zezizezi/evu_omahyra_boyd_02.jpg

    Warning: BOOBS

    [Reply]

    Anonymous replied:

    P!nk does that look amazingly well too:

    http://i53.tinypic.com/rbfsyb.jpg (beware of boobs)

    [Reply]

    Jay replied:

    Oh wow. That’s a great pic!

    [Reply]

    Tommy replied:

    I like this one: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kz5llv8MNS1qzk5h3o1_400.jpg

    They photoshopped the hell out of it, it seems :( but it’s still a nice pic!

    [Reply]

  11. Bean

    [Reply]

  12. Ronen

    Bean, I *love* photos like that. Shirtlessness is a typically masculine act, yet we’re seeing a torso that many would classify as female. It illustrates androgyny in a way that’s totally different from erasing the breasts.

    [Reply]

  13. James

    unfortunately, i don’t think that’s actually pink. :(
    and i agree with ronan. personally, i feel more masculine when i have my shirt off even though i have breasts.

    [Reply]

    Jay replied:

    Me too! Its a shame I live in a dorm (co-ed, at that), otherwise I’d walk around with my towel around my waist after a shower, instead of up around my chest. Somehow, wearing it around my waist always feels more masculine.

    [Reply]

    Jessica replied:

    And if you have a regular sized towel, instead of a large towel, having it up around your armpits is not exactly modest, especially if you drop something. And being larger around the top than around the waist means I don’t have as much overlap of the towel. Having the towel around your waist is like a comgy skirt, while having it around your chest is like being a sausage.

    [Reply]

    Jay replied:

    Yeah, I’m lucky and have a large towel and am not very large on the top at all. :/ My sympathies if thats your case!

    Meike replied:

    Actually that is Pink; she has the “What goes around comes around” tattoo on her wrist.

    Also, totally agree with the towel sentiments!

    [Reply]

    Jessica replied:

    @Jay Maybe I just have small towels :-) … I’m much happier (top or bottom) if I have what I call a beach towel than what I consider a normal sized bath towel. The towels they often have at most gyms are inadequate to cover up anyone who’s not five feet tall and anorexic – be they male or female or neither or both.

    [Reply]

  14. Listener

    I have to agree with this being the more dominant view of androgyny, but my personal view of androgyny includes a wide variety of forms and their combinations. Boobs don’t “make” a woman and they don’t “unmake” a man, you are what’s in your mind. ;)

    [Reply]

  15. kat

    it’s for these sorts of reasons I’ve always hated the term “moobs”… sometimes men have breasts, whatever. it’s not like women have elbows and men have “melbows”.

    [Reply]

    Adrian replied:

    Finally, someone else who hates the term moobs! I feel the same way about guyliner too, and murse. Just because a man has it or uses it doesn’t make it a different thing.

    [Reply]

  16. Jessica

    If you want to barve controversy, try wearing a kilt in scotland if you’re a girl.

    [Reply]

    Jas replied:

    While still being read as a girl, I wore a gothypants takeoff of ‘proper’ kilted attire to my grad dance. At a prissy private school in Scotland. It was glorious.
    http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs545.snc3/29855_406053571768_653586768_4197006_592899_n.jpg

    [Reply]

  17. kendall

    I jokingly refer to mine as moobs, I try to say “my chest” as much as possible, I think tit is much more offensive than moob and I’m sure theres tons of people who have brought back and reclaimed “the c word” but I think back to 2 specific situations
    1-fight club’s bob has bitch tits
    2-the scene in dogma

    BETHANY

    Oh, those weren’t tits I saw Jay cozying up to?

    SERENDIPITY

    (tugs on boobs)

    What, these? You should know better than anyone at this table that tits
    don’t make a woman.

    RUFUS

    Hell, the tubby, coat-wearing mother fucker’s got tits – don’t make him a
    woman.

    SERENDIPITY

    Aside from an intuitive knack for accessorizing, what traditionally defines
    a woman falls between two things : her legs. But as you can see…

    Serendipity stands and unbuttons her jeans, dropping them slightly,
    revealing yet another smooth, sexless crotch, quite like Metatron’s.

    SERENDIPITY

    I lack definition.

    [Reply]

    Sammie/Faerie replied:

    I Love Dogma – so glad you referenced that scene, it made me smile :)

    [Reply]

  18. Anonymous

    Well, My thought is that androgyny is to look like both, yet neither. The step further would be nippleless <funny spelling) Ex. Look at Manson's Mechanical Animals Cover with the body-cast.

    [Reply]

  19. Sean

    There’s a person at my school who is ridiculously androgynous, despite having breasts. Granted they’re small, but they’re there, and this person often wears shirts that actually show them.

    [Reply]

  20. Graid

    Oh my! Thanks so much for pointing that out. I’d sort of realised it and internalised it and let it limit my ideas of what I can really do with myself without ever thinking about it clearly in those terms, and yet it’s so true. I’ve felt for a long time like my body in general is not really fitting to my personality and I really think the part where I feel more or less androgynous and yet look exaggeratedly feminine bodily, as in the above idea, is why.

    [Reply]

  21. Sammie/Faerie

    Another example of androgyny with breasts is the character Shane McKutcheon from the L Word. She had an androgynous, skater-esque appearance but did not attempt to conceal nor advertize ownership of her breasts.

    [Reply]


Leave a Reply


Can I show your picture? If you have a Gravatar associated with this email address, it will be displayed as your photo. If not, I'll just put a picture of a fork next to your comment. Everybody likes forks.

Be nice. Judgmental comments will be quietly deleted and blacklisted. There's plenty of room for those elsewhere on the web.

For legal reasons, you must be age 13 or older to post a comment on Genderfork.

You can use some HTML tags for formatting, e.g. <em>...</em> for emphasis (italics) or <strong>...</strong> for strong emphasis (bold) or <a href="http://(url)">...</a> for links.


Back to top